TIANLICHUJU — PERSONAL VERIFICATION WORKSHEET An elegant kitchen based on proportions rather than ornament https://tianlichuju.com/journal/an-elegant-kitchen-based-on-proportions-rather-than-ornament/ PROPOSED CHECKS — NO MEASURED RESULTS SUPPLIED Date: __________________ Units: __________________ Room / product reference: __________________ 1. Whole-run rhythm and inventory Where: On an elevation showing every door, drawer, appliance, filler, window, and upper junction. Record: Label the contents behind each front, record clear openings in centimeters, and mark divisions chosen for appearance rather than a useful compartment. Your observation: ______________________________________________ Interpretation: The drawing reveals storage sacrificed to graphic order; it does not establish fabrication tolerances or the adequacy of a cabinet structure. Alternative: Change the front rhythm when a decorative narrow drawer or tall door prevents convenient use of the actual inventory. 2. Profile and handle interaction Where: At a full-depth finished door sample with the intended handle and a comparable operating load. Record: Note finger room, wet-hand grip, recess wiping, and projections into neighboring fronts; record hole positions in millimeters for a replacement proposal. Your observation: ______________________________________________ Interpretation: A good-looking sample is not proof of repeated-use durability or compatibility with existing hinges and carcasses. Alternative: Simplify the profile or choose a more useful pull before repeating an awkward detail across the entire kitchen. 3. Architectural termination Where: At cabinet ends and tops where the new work meets ceiling, existing trim, or an irregular wall. Record: Request a section showing gap, filler, support, and cleaning access; label which old features remain and which changes require assessment. Your observation: ______________________________________________ Interpretation: A resolved section can expose an accidental narrow gap but does not confirm old-building condition or permission to alter retained fabric. Alternative: Use a deliberate clear termination rather than forcing a near-fit that is difficult to clean or repair. PRACTICAL TRIAL 1. Compare repeated fronts as a run instead of selecting one isolated door. 2. Test finish sheen under the actual worktop task light. 3. Ask how a single damaged front or handle can be reordered or renewed. COMPARE THE SAME SCOPE - Useful internal organization and complete elevation - Front profile, handles, and exact finish - End conditions, installation adjustment, and future repair Cost drivers: Nonstandard divisions and decorative profiles; Careful fitting beneath retained architecture; Preparation, coating, and making good excluded from door-only prices Choose another route when: An ornament-led cabinet scheme is unsuitable when its repeated detail overwhelms the room or makes useful storage and frequently wiped surfaces unnecessarily awkward. EVIDENCE BOUNDARY No cabinet design has been dimensionally checked or installed. The worksheet proposes a review sequence, not evidence that a particular profile is elegant or durable. PHOTO REFERENCE A dining table sits in the foreground of a kitchen with extensive work surfaces, windows and open storage. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:House_interior_in_Brisbane_2014_01.jpg DECISION CONDITIONS choose: Choose the complete front rhythm after each compartment serves the real inventory and the handle, coating, profile, and ends work in the actual kitchen. alternative: Use a simpler front and one useful hardware accent when repeated ornament crowds small drawers or makes a frequently wiped run needlessly difficult. stop: Stop approving isolated door samples if appliance fronts, fillers, existing trim, or installation tolerances remain absent from the drawing that is being priced. PUBLISHED REFERENCES Blum CLIP top: Assembly, adjustment and removal https://www.blum.com/nz/en/products/hingesystems/clip-top/assembly/ Blum's CLIP top documentation separates door attachment from side, height, and depth adjustment. The named system illustrates that a cabinet front's aligned appearance depends on specific working hardware, not only on the decorative proportions drawn across the elevation. Scope: Exact CLIP top example only; it does not establish that another hinge, retained cabinet, or chosen front shares these functions. Photographer: Chris Olszewski Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0 Notes: ________________________________________________________