TIANLICHUJU — PERSONAL VERIFICATION WORKSHEET
An eclectic kitchen with coordinated working heights
https://tianlichuju.com/journal/an-eclectic-kitchen-with-coordinated-working-heights/

PROPOSED CHECKS — NO MEASURED RESULTS SUPPLIED
Date: __________________  Units: __________________
Room / product reference: __________________

1. Task-specific effective height
Where: At each proposed freestanding or fitted surface with the actual board, appliance and regular user.
Record: Measure the working surface and added equipment heights in centimeters; note bending, shoulders and reach.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: A visually coordinated furniture group can still create accidental uncomfortable task changes.
Alternative: Assign another role or use a properly designed alternative station instead of unstable height adjustments.

2. Meal transfer sequence
Where: Along the route from ingredients through preparation, cooking, washing and returning dishes.
Record: List each landing surface, height transition and interruption involving another person or movable piece.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: The main working sequence should not depend on repeated awkward transfers between unrelated furniture heights.
Alternative: Reposition tasks or simplify the collection around one dependable preparation area.

3. Adapted furniture and junctions
Where: At the base, added top, neighboring cabinet gap and any service connection of the older piece.
Record: Record known finish history, support details, cleanable gaps and who assesses the intended adaptation.
Your observation: ______________________________________________
Interpretation: A heavy new top or matching paint does not establish suitable construction or food-preparation use.
Alternative: Keep the piece for dry storage or another less demanding role.

PRACTICAL TRIAL
1. Rehearse a familiar meal across the proposed stations and include two users if the kitchen is commonly shared.
2. Compare actual contents and service access before closing the gap between freestanding furniture and a fitted run.
3. Obtain a clear adaptation scope covering support, finish, stability and qualified service work before cosmetic coordination.

COMPARE THE SAME SCOPE
- Task assigned to each surface
- Effective working height including equipment
- Adaptation and support specification
- Cleaning and service access at junctions
Cost drivers: Older furniture assessment and repair; New supported worktop construction; Qualified service relocation or connection
Choose another route when: The collected arrangement is unsuitable when core preparation depends on improvised risers or furniture whose condition and finish remain unknown.

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY
This is a task-layout verification plan. It does not prescribe a universal work height or certify adapted furniture for structural or food-contact use.

PHOTO REFERENCE
Pale cabinets and a peninsula face dark appliances and a backsplash, with stools on the outer side.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kitchen_(Unsplash).jpg

DECISION CONDITIONS
choose: Choose mixed freestanding pieces when each has a useful assigned job and the real preparation, transfer and cleanup sequence works at the resulting effective heights for the actual user.
alternative: Reassign a low piece to storage or serving and retain one suitable preparation station when visual variety produces repeated awkward changes during a normal meal.
stop: Stop improvised blocks or unstable height adjustments, and do not prescribe a universal working height when individual approach or support needs remain unresolved.

PUBLISHED REFERENCES
US Access Board: ADA standards, section 804
https://www.access-board.gov/ada/
The Access Board's covered-kitchen provisions coordinate work-surface height with forward approach and knee-and-toe clearance rather than treating height alone as access. They illustrate the need to consider the whole task position, while legal applicability and an individual's useful working arrangement must be assessed separately.
Scope: ADA scoping is facility- and project-specific; these provisions are not a universal private-home height prescription or individual ergonomic assessment.
Photographer: Naomi Hébert naomish
Licence: CC0 http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/deed.en

Notes: ________________________________________________________